J Zhu*, T Cui, Y Zhang, Y Zhang, C Ma, B Liu, K Nie, N Yue, X Wang, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ

• 
  J Zhu

• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• 
  

PO-GePV-T-88 (Sunday, 7/25/2021)   [Eastern Time (GMT-4)]

Purpose: This study aims to design an empirical method using the analytical and machine learning (ML) models to estimate proton output in a double scattering proton system.

Methods: Three analytical models using polynomial, linear fitting, and logarithm-polynomial equations were generated on a training datasets consisting 1544 clinical measurements to estimate proton output for each option. Meanwhile, three ML models using Gaussian process regression GPR with exponential kernel, squared exponential kernel, and rational quadratic kernel were also created for all options combined. The accuracy of each model was validated against additional 241 clinical measurements as testing datasets. Two most robust models were selected, and the minimum number of samples needed for either model to achieve sufficient accuracy (±3%) was determined by evaluating the mean average percentage error (MAPE) with increasing sample number. The differences between the estimated outputs using the two models were also compared for 1000 proton beams with randomly generated range, and modulation for each option.

Results: The polynomial model and the ML GPR model with exponential kernel yielded the most accurate estimations with less than 3% deviation from the measured outputs. At least 20 samples of each option were needed to build the polynomial model with less than 1% MAPE, whereas at least a total of 400 samples were needed for all beam options to build the ML GPR model with exponential kernel to achieve comparable accuracy. The two independent models agreed with less than 2% deviation using the testing datasets.

Conclusion: The polynomial model and the ML GPR model with exponential kernel were built for proton output estimation with less than 3% deviations from the measurements. They can be used as an independent output prediction tool for a double scattering proton beam, and a secondary output check tool for cross check between themselves.

ePosters

Keywords

Not Applicable / None Entered.

Taxonomy

Not Applicable / None Entered.

Contact Email