Exhibit Hall | Forum 9
Purpose: The capability of detecting pudendal nerves from an adjacent vessel is a challenging task in MRI due to spatial resolution limitations and its inherent small caliber. Aim of this study is to evaluate if quantitative Apparent-Diffusion-Coefficient (ADC) values can aid in detection of the abnormal pudendal nerve and help distinguish from normal vessels in cases of absent or mild neuropathy.
Methods: A retrospective review of patients >18 years (n=17) with chronic pelvic pain and clinical symptoms of pudendal neuralgia who underwent institutional MR pelvis neurography protocol was performed. MR protocol included sagittal-T2, axial 3D-DESS, T2-FS, T1, and DWI (b-values: 50,400,800 s/mm²) with total scan time: 20min. Mean ADC values from MR-DWI were noted from ROIs placed by the radiologist on the abnormal nerve (identified on DESS, T2-FS and/or DWI-ADC using DynaCAD). ROIs were placed on single and multiple slices along the course of the nerve, and then further normalized with bladder to account for any signal fluctuations.
Results: Mean ADC ± standard error from the abnormal pudendal nerves were 1343.98±54.14 (single slice) and 1294.73±52.81 (multiple slice) (x10⁻⁶mm²/s) respectively, indicating restricted motion, possibly due to the presence of abnormal nerve fibers. The nerves were confirmed by quantified ADC values in comparison to adjacent vessels with higher ADC (~2000 x1010⁻⁶mm²/s). No statistically significant difference between ADCs from single vs. multiple slices (p > 0.05) was observed. Normalized ADC of pudendal nerves to bladder was as follows: single slice: 0.44±0.02 and multiple slices: 0.39±0.02. Limitations included small sample size and nerve not detectable on ADC maps when normal or with mild neuropathy.
Conclusion: This study shows that quantitative ADC values can be used as a potential marker to detect and distinguish the challenging abnormal pudendal nerve in patients and aid in treatments with nerve block injections typically done without precise image guidance.