Click here to

Session: Personalized Treatment via Outcome Modeling [Return to Session]

A Novel Probabilistic Approach for Personalized Radiotherapy: Integrating Machine Learning and Optimization

A Ajdari*, T Bortfeld, Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation BioPhysics, Boston, MA.

Presentations

TH-D-BRC-1 (Thursday, 7/14/2022) 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM [Eastern Time (GMT-4)]

Ballroom C

Purpose: Traditional radiotherapy (RT) treatment planning relies on population-wide estimates of organ tolerance to minimize excess toxicity. Though conventional machine learning (ML) models can predict patient-specific toxicity, they rely on binary classifications which are not amenable to nuanced RT adaptations. We propose a (Bayesian) probabilistic ML-based approach for predicting patient-specific risk and personalizing the RT workflow.

Methods: Sixty-nine non-small cell lung cancer patients with baseline and mid-treatment [18]F-flurodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET images were retrospectively analyzed. A probabilistic Bayesian Networks (BN) model was developed to update the prior (baseline) risk of radiation pneumonitis (RP) and estimate a posterior risk upon obtaining mid-treatment FDG information. Subsequently, a patient-specific dose modifying factor, DMF, as a surrogate for lung radiosensitivity, was estimated to personalize the LKB normal tissue toxicity probability (NTCP) model. This personalized NTCP was then integrated into a NTCP-based optimization model for RT adaptation, ensuring tumor coverage and respecting patient-specific lung radiosensitivity.

Results: The magnitude of the predicted risks corresponded with the RP severity. Average predicted risk for grade 1-4 RP were 0.18, 0.42, 0.63, and 0.76, respectively (p<0.001). The proposed model yielded an average AUC of 0.87, outperforming the AUCs of LKB-NTCP (0.77), pre-treatment BN (0.81), and random forest (0.83). Average for the radio-tolerant (RP grade=1) and radiosensitive (grade≥2) groups were 0.8 and 1.63, p<0.01, with DMF=1 denoting “average” (population-wide) radiosensitivity. RT personalization in 15 cases resulted in 5 dose escalation strategies (average mean tumor dose increase=6.47 Gy), and 10 dose de-escalation with average mean lung dose reduction of 2.98 Gy, corresponding to average NTCP reduction of 15%. The intensity of RT adaptation was based on the magnitude of the predicted risk.

Conclusion: Moving from binary classifications to more nuanced probabilistic predictions is key in realizing RT personalization. Our proposal shows such probabilistic frameworks could yield significant NTCP-related benefits without compromising tumor control.

Funding Support, Disclosures, and Conflict of Interest: This study was partially funded by the National Cancer Institute under grant #R01CA266275 and the Therapy Imaging Program (TIP) funded by the Federal Share of program income earned by Massachusetts General Hospital on C06CA059267, Proton Therapy Research and Treatment Center.

Keywords

Not Applicable / None Entered.

Taxonomy

Not Applicable / None Entered.

Contact Email

Share: